Understanding Arizona’s Comparative Negligence Law

Phoenix Personal Injury Lawyer Jack Hirsch - Contact for Legal Help
Get in touch
Over $100 million recovered for injury victims
— No Fee If No Recovery —
300+ Google reviews 4.9
Confidential
Free Consultation

Arizona operates under comparative negligence law, meaning victims can still recover compensation even if they are partially responsible for the accident. This law allows plaintiffs to claim damages based on their degree of fault, though their compensation is reduced proportionally. For example, if you are 20% at fault, your total compensation is reduced by 20%.

Key Points of Arizona’s Comparative Negligence Law:

  • Partial fault doesn’t bar compensation.
  • Damages are reduced based on the plaintiff’s percentage of fault.
  • Applies to various accident types: car, truck, and personal injury cases. For those involved in car accidents, it’s important to consult the best car accident lawyers in Phoenix to ensure you understand how comparative negligence may affect your case.

How Comparative Negligence Impacts Your Case

Illustration of a courtroom scene in Arizona showing a lawyer, judge, and truck accident, symbolizing comparative negligence in determining fault.

Under Arizona’s comparative negligence statute, it’s crucial to establish fault accurately. This is where an experienced attorney can help by minimizing your percentage of fault and maximizing potential compensation. Our firm utilizes unique strategies to gather evidence, reconstruct accidents, and work with experts to ensure you receive the highest possible settlement or verdict.

Legal Strategy:

  • Thorough accident investigations to minimize liability.
  • Expert witness testimony to clarify fault distribution.
  • Negotiation tactics to reduce your percentage of fault during settlement discussions.

Why You Need an Experienced Attorney

If you’ve been involved in an accident, navigating Arizona’s comparative negligence law can be complex. Our experienced lawyers are well-versed in local laws and regulations, ensuring you get the compensation you deserve, even if you bear partial responsibility for the accident.

Additional Insights on Arizona’s Comparative Negligence Law

Arizona’s adoption of pure comparative negligence allows plaintiffs to recover compensation no matter their percentage of fault. This differs from states that use modified comparative negligence, where plaintiffs cannot recover if they are 50% or more at fault. In Arizona, even if you are 90% responsible for the accident, you can still recover 10% of the damages.

Illustration of a courtroom scene in Arizona with a lawyer presenting evidence in a truck accident case, showcasing comparative negligence law.

This law is particularly important in multi-vehicle accidents or complex truck accident cases where multiple parties may share responsibility. It ensures that plaintiffs aren’t unfairly barred from seeking compensation due to shared fault. In multi-vehicle accidents, such as when sharing the lane with multiple motorcycles, determining fault can become more complex, making Arizona’s comparative negligence law crucial.

Arizona Comparative Negligence Law Explained: Key Insights and Legal Resources

  1. Arizona Revised Statutes – Comparative Negligence: This official state legislature page outlines the specific legal framework for comparative negligence in Arizona. Linking to it provides readers with accurate and authoritative legal references.
  2. Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) – Crash Facts: ADOT offers detailed crash statistics for Arizona, including reports on accidents involving large trucks. This data can contextualize the importance of comparative negligence in truck accidents.
  3. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) – Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts: This report contains nationwide crash data for large trucks and buses, offering insight into the frequency and severity of these accidents.
  4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) – Crash Report Sampling System: This federal resource provides comprehensive data on traffic crashes, making it a valuable source to back up claims about accident severity and frequency.

 

Comparative Negligence in Personal Injury Cases:

  • Insurance Implications: Insurance companies often use comparative negligence to reduce payouts. They may argue you are more at fault than you actually are. Knowing the common defenses utilized in motor vehicle accident lawsuits can help plaintiffs and their lawyers anticipate the arguments that may arise in a comparative negligence claim.
  • Proving Fault: A solid legal strategy is essential for minimizing your share of the blame and maximizing your compensation.

Having an experienced attorney who understands the intricacies of Arizona’s comparative negligence law can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

Contact us today for expert legal advice.

We handle all cases on a contingency fee basis, which means that you will never have to pay us any fees until we secure a recovery in your case. Not a dime for our time, unless we collect for you! For a free consultation with a Phoenix injury lawyer, call (602) 535-1900 or contact us online today.